Refacto TerminalKalshi
Healthy
AdvertisementYour banner here · 728 × 90 · ads@refacto.app

← Explore · Kalshi · Market KXPNP-32-30JAN01

Will P vs NP be resolved before 2030?

29.0% implied · bid 27.0¢ · ask 31.0¢

☆ Log in to track☆ Log in to set an alert

A · Price & probability

The market prices this at 29.0%, down 1.0pt over 24h, on a 4.0¢ spread.

Implied probability29.0%
Bid / ask / mid27.0¢ / 31.0¢ / 29.0¢
Spread4.0¢ (13.8%)
Change 24h-1.00pt
Change 7d+0.00pt
Longshot tax-24% historically (20-35¢ bucket)

B · Liquidity & flow

Thin (score 31/100) — trade small; large orders will move the price. Order book leans 17% to the ask (sellers).

Volume 24h$0
Volume qualityPro
Depth ±5¢ (bid/ask)$683 / $1,465
Imbalance17% bid
Large trades (>$1k)0
Liquidity score31.1 / 100

C · Momentum & volatility

RSI 43 (neutral); price is below its 7-day mean by 1.2σ — a mild deviation.

Z-score vs 7d mean-1.19
RSI (14, hourly)42.9
Realized vol 7d0.55pt
Change 1h+0.50pt

E · Time & structure

Resolves in 1890d 12h.

Time to resolve1890d 12h
Resolution sourcedocumented
Rules riskmedium (25)
Sum of outcomes100.0%

Price history

Probability timeline

Order-book depth

Cost to trade

Pro See what a live order would actually cost after walking the book, and the edge/EV/Kelly at that real price. Upgrade

Longshot tax — return by price bucket

This market's 20-35¢ bucket has returned -24% per $1, historically.

Other venues

Pro See the live Kalshi ↔ Polymarket gap, the after-fee combined cost of hedging both legs, and its history. Upgrade

How this settles

DeadlineNot published.
Close → settlementExpected settlement is 17520.0h after scheduled close.

Summary

If P versus NP Problem in its official Clay Mathematics Institute formulation is resolved before Jan 1, 2030 under the Payout Criterion and that resolution has not been retracted, withdrawn, repudiated, or rescinded prior to the Expiration time, then the market resolves to Yes.

Expanded rules

For purposes of this Contract, P versus NP Problem in its official Clay Mathematics Institute formulation is considered resolved if at least one of the following occurs and has not been retracted, withdrawn, repudiated, or rescinded prior to the Expiration time: A peer-reviewed article presenting a complete proof, a complete disproof, or a counterexample establishing the falsity of the conjecture, in the conjecture's original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, has been published in one or more Source Agency peer-reviewed journals. A recognized authoritative body for the academic field of the conjecture, including but not limited to Annals of Mathematics, the American Mathematical Society, the International Mathematical Union, a national academy of sciences, the Nobel Foundation, or an equivalent governing or recognition body for the relevant academic field, has officially recognized in a written communication that the conjecture, in its original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, has been resolved by reference to a specific written work. At least two Source Agencies have published reporting describing the conjecture, in its original form as specified by the Exchange at Issuance, as having been proven, disproven, or otherwise resolved by reference to a specific publicly available written work, and no Source Agency has, prior to the Expiration time, published reporting that such written work has been formally retracted by its author(s) or by any publishing journal, has been formally withdrawn or repudiated by its author(s), or contains an identified error that has not been publicly corrected or addressed by the author(s) in a subsequent publication or amendment.