Refacto TerminalKalshi
Healthy
AdvertisementYour banner here · 728 × 90 · ads@refacto.app

← Explore · Kalshi · Market KXVISADEBIT-DOJ30

Will any federal court rule rules that Visa Inc. violated Section 1 or Section 2 of the Sherman Act on any claim for relief asserted by the United States?

62.5% implied · bid 58.0¢ · ask 67.0¢

☆ Log in to track☆ Log in to set an alert

A · Price & probability

The market prices this at 68.0%, down 1.0pt over 24h, on a 9.0¢ spread.

Implied probability68.0%
Bid / ask / mid58.0¢ / 67.0¢ / 62.5¢
Spread9.0¢ (14.4%)
Change 24h-1.00pt
Change 7d-0.50pt
Longshot tax+5% historically (65-80¢ bucket)

B · Liquidity & flow

Thin (score 5/100) — trade small; large orders will move the price. Order book leans 4% to the ask (sellers).

Volume 24h$6
Volume qualityPro
Depth ±5¢ (bid/ask)$116 / $0
Imbalance4% bid
Large trades (>$1k)0
Liquidity score5.1 / 100

C · Momentum & volatility

RSI 49 (neutral); price is above its 7-day mean by 1.4σ — a mild deviation.

Z-score vs 7d mean1.42
RSI (14, hourly)49.2
Realized vol 7d4.76pt
Change 1h-5.50pt

E · Time & structure

Resolves in 1154d 11h.

Time to resolve1154d 11h
Resolution sourcedocumented
Rules riskmedium (40)
Sum of outcomes100.0%

Price history

Probability timeline

Order-book depth

Cost to trade

Pro See what a live order would actually cost after walking the book, and the edge/EV/Kelly at that real price. Upgrade

Longshot tax — return by price bucket

This market's 65-80¢ bucket has returned +5% per $1, historically.

Other venues

Pro See the live Kalshi ↔ Polymarket gap, the after-fee combined cost of hedging both legs, and its history. Upgrade

How this settles

DeadlineNot published.
Close → settlementExpected settlement is 10.0h after scheduled close.

Summary

If any federal court rules that Visa Inc. violated Section 1 or Section 2 of the Sherman Act on any claim for relief asserted by the United States in United States v. Visa Inc., No. 1:24-cv-07214 (S.D.N.Y.), or any appeal of that action before Jan 1, 2030, then the market resolves to Yes.

Expanded rules

Liability on any one of the four claims for relief the United States pleaded is enough, and partial liability counts. An order that only sets or modifies a remedy does not qualify unless it also carries the liability holding. The ruling must: Be issued by a federal court in United States v. Visa Inc., No. 1:24-cv-07214 (S.D.N.Y.), or any appeal of that action Address the matter described by the specified judgment Be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment, or decision The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: The June 23, 2025 order denying Visa's motion to dismiss, or any later ruling on a motion to dismiss A consent decree, settlement, or voluntary dismissal, including a consent decree entered by the court A ruling in any other Visa antitrust matter, including the payment card interchange fee litigation Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Administrative or scheduling orders